🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.